Lessons in Discovery from Lynn Silver + Pro-con on alternatives to antibiotics

Dear All:

“Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions … and paying attention.”

You’ve probably heard the first part of that before, but the “… and paying attention” is my addition and reflection upon reading Lynn Silver’s most recent commentary in the Springer Series Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, edited by Jed Fisher, Marvin Miller and Shahriar Mobashery. Entitled “The Antibiotic Future,” it is a discussion of the hurdles of antibiotic discovery and a summary of Lynn’s far-ranging & pithy insights. It’s not open access so you’ll have to download yourself, but here’s the link and the abstract:

  • Cite: Silver LL. The Antibiotic Future. In: Fisher J, Miller M, Mobashery S, editors. Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017. p. 1-37.
  • Link: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/7355_2017_24
  • Abstract: Will the future of antibacterial therapy rely on an ongoing pipeline of new small molecule, direct-acting antibacterial agents that inhibit or kill bacterial pathogens, referred to here as antibiotics? What role will these small-molecule antibiotics have in the control of the bacterial infections of the future? Although there is today increased activity in the field of new antibiotic discovery, the history of this field over the past 30 years is a history of low output. This low output of new antibiotics does not encourage confidence that they can be central to the future control of bacterial infection. This low productivity is often blamed upon financial disincentives in the pharmaceutical industry, and on regulatory difficulties. But I believe that a critical underlying reason for the dearth of novel products is the fundamental difficulty of the science, coupled with a failure to directly grapple with the key scientific challenges that prevent forward motion. The future fate of antibiotic discovery will depend upon the degree to which the rate limiting steps of discovery are fully recognized, and the discovery technology turns to overcoming these blockades.

In the paper, Lynn covers everything from alternatives to antibiotics (see also below), natural products, the problem of frequency of resistance, combinations, the question of new vs. old targets, and more. This paper is great tour of the entire area and you’ll learn something from it whether you are new to the field or an old hand.

Lynn is truly a master of this field and she has over the years written many instructive papers. Just below, I provide a list of some of my favorites from her published works. If you’re doing drug discovery and haven’t explored her writings, I strongly encourage you to take an afternoon to study them in detail. I especially recommend the 2011 paper in CMR:

Finally, and if you’re interested in non-antibiotic alternative approaches, Lynn’s comments on this area may make you want to dig further. A good place to start would be with the 3 papers below — collectively, they provide a good set of pro-con comments on the challenges of this strategy. The alternatives that seek to work in combination or as enhancers are going to be very tricky to develop and it’s important to understand the issues:

In short, knowing what has come before is the only way that I know to avoid repeating past mistakes. If you’re going to make a mistake, please make a new one … it’s much more productive! Many thanks to Lynn for sharing her insights via these publications.

Best wishes,

–jr

John H. Rex, MD | Chief Medical Officer, F2G Ltd. | Chief Strategy Officer, CARB-X | Expert-in-Residence, Wellcome Trust. Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx. See past newsletters and subscribe for the future: https://13.43.35.2/blog.html

Upcoming meetings of interest to the AMR community:

Share

Conflict-Borne XDR Superbugs: It’s Time for the PASTEUR Act!

Dear All: The recent publication of an exceptionally good plain-language summary of the AMR problem in Rolling Stone (yes, you read that correctly!) prompts today’s 3-part journey into the way(s) that war contributes to the threat of resistant superbugs. We’ve summarized the story in outline form — please explore the references for further details. And

ENABLE-2 funding now includes Hit Identification & Validation

23 July 2024 addenda x 2:  Mark Blaskovich let me know that the CO-ADD project is still offering a free in vitro screening service. See https://www.co-add.org/ to submit compounds for free testing vs 5 bacteria and 2 fungi; see https://db.co-add.org/ for structures and screening data on >100K compounds. The GHIT Fund has announced its 21st Request for Proposals for its Hit-to-Lead Platform to

NIAID/DMID thinking for FY2026: Antibacterials, Phage, and Antifungals

Dear All, NIAID’s DMID (Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) recently held a council meeting during which they proposed program concepts that encompassed both antibacterial therapies (including phage) as well as antifungal therapies for funding in FY 2026 (the year that would run from 1 Oct 2025 to 30 Sep 2026). There is no guarantee that

WHO Antibacterial Pipeline Review: Update thru 31 Dec 2023

Dear All, WHO have released an update through 31 Dec 2023 of their ongoing series of antibacterial pipeline reviews! Here are the links you need: The report: 2023 Antibacterial agents in clinical and preclinical development: an overview and analysis and a press release about the report. Infographics: Key facts and recommendations from the 2023 antibacterial agents in clinical

Scroll to Top