FDA Workshop: Animal models in support of narrow-spectrum agents for A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa

Dear All:

FDA today hosted their eagerly awaited workshop on animal models in support of narrow-spectrum agents for A. baumannii (Abau) and P. aeruginosa (Pae). It was a really full & interesting day at the end of which my confidence that we can actually register narrow-spectrum agents for these two pathogens (and others that are even less frequent) is really improved.

We don’t have all the answers, but the basic shape of the answer is apparent and FDA is firmly committed to making it happen. An extended version of what I heard today is found below my signature, but here are the core elements:

  1. There is an urgent need for new agents for Pae & Abau
    • Finding agents that cover ONLY Pae or Abau seems often easier than finding broad agents that also cover them
    • But, their relative rarity make Abau- or Pae-only agents hard to study at standard statistical strength
  2. Using the Animal Rule (aka, Tier D) isn’t a straightforward path
    • Abau and Pae lack the explosive virulence that makes primate models of plague et al. so compelling
  3. So, this is the land of Tier C: Very strong animal models + at least some clinical data
    • It’s not a path to be pursued unless there is no other choice, but it is a path we should make available.
  4. The animal model program in support of Tier C? Some combination of
    • Smaller animals (mostly mice): Exhaustive PK-PD exploration
    • Larger animals (up to pigs): A (very) small number of confirmatory studies
    • All models: Internal controls using humanized exposures of control agents that both should & should not work
  5. The clinical program in support of a Tier C program? As much data as you can generate
  6. The point of all this? Gives the data to make a compelling case both to the ID community and the payers

All best wishes, –jr
Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx

Extended notes from the 1 Mar 2017 FDA workshop on animal models to support narrow spectrum agents

  1. There is an urgent need for new agents for P. aeruginosa (Pae) and A. baumannii (Abau)
    • Infections due these pathogens have high mortality and resistance is real and common
  2. But, It’s really hard to find drug candidates that include Pae and Abau
    • Some companies have made progress by narrowing their focus to JUST Pae & Abau
    • Compelling narrow-spectrum candidates vs. both bacteria have now emerged
  3. Frustratingly, developing an agent limited to one of these pathogens is really hard
    • An FDA workshop last year (Drug X-1, 18-19 Jul 2016) showed how tough it was
    • Today’s workshop picked up where last summer’s left off and began with presentations on Unmet Need followed by brief reviews of two drug candidates (Polyphor and Entasis)
    • These companies both proposed programs that might (just barely) be feasible. But, just barely … and not proven
  4. And, what about Stenotrophomonas or something else even more rare and difficult?
  5. So, the workshop today asked what be required of the animal models if want to seriously entertain a Tier C-type data package (Rex JH et al. Lancet ID 13:269-75, 2013) for approval of a new agent:
    • Tier A: Multiple standard P3 trials
    • Tier B: One standard P3 trial
    • Tier C: Zero standard P3 trials but some clinical data
    • Tier D: No clinical data except for safety
  6. Tier D (aka, the animal rule) is not a consistently plausible path. Prior uses of this rule have depended on
    • The incredible virulence of the bacteria (plague, tularemia, anthrax)
    • The fact that a very aggressive infection is produced easily with a low inoculum in healthy animals
    • The fact that infection pathogenesis looks a LOT like the infection man
  7. But, Pae and Abau do not lend themselves to such simple and clear animal models as
    • Healthy hosts are often very resistant to infection
      • Hence, we often have to manipulate the host
    • Degree of mimicry of infection in man is not as high
    • Not all strains are equally virulent
  8. So, and if a clinical trial with standard statistical dimensions is NOT possible, can we (how can we) lean more on PK-PD?
  9. Q: Can we? A: Yes, provided
    • We are completely transparent about why we’re doing this
    • We make it clear that stronger clinical data simply are not feasible
    • We describe the limits on the overall dataset in the product label
    • And the community is suitably cautious about their use
  10. Q: How can we? A: The basis of approval might thus be (and this is subject to further discussion)
    • Clear demonstration of target PK-PD parameters in multiple small animal (mouse) models – various sites, various strains
    • (perhaps) some confirmation of this in a medium-sized animal (rabbit)
    • And finally (perhaps) very limited confirmation in a well-standardized large animal model (e.g., pig)
    • Across all models, make use of benchmark control molecules
    • Give humanized exposures with drugs that should / should not work
    • Use standard benchmarks to prove the model is sensitive
    • And finally, collect whatever clinical data you can
  11. Statistical interpretation then makes allowance for the clinical trial limitations
    • You could think of this as using the animal data to support a larger alpha or a Bayesian prior

Share

WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogen List (PPL): 2024 update

Dear All, WHO have just released a 2024 update to their 2017 (bacterial) Priority Pathogen List (PPL)! Here are the links you need: The WHO 2024 PPL. WHO’s webpage about the 2024 PPL. A PowerPoint (.pptx) deck (and there is also a .pdf version) summarizing the new PPL and all prior PPLs. 22 May 2024 post-newsletter

Environmental, Animal, and Human Uses of Phage: WHO webinars

Dear All, I have just this weekend learned of a 3-part WHO webinar series on uses of phage. Two of the webinars have already been held; the 3rd is scheduled for 16 May. All are / will be available for post-webinar review. The links you need are below — in addition, a copy of the

New UK 5-year AMR plan: Subscription model details!

Dear All, Today is a newsletter double-header! Coming hard on the heels of the opportunity to support an ESCMID petition to UNGA 2024, the UK today released the details of its next five-year action plan. Excitingly for this audience, there is an updated roadmap for the UK’s next steps in its subscription model. Here are

ESCMID’s UNGA 2024 Petition to EU Health Ministers: Sign and Send!

Dear All, During the GLG AMR (Global Leaders Group for AMR) event just before ECCMID (see the 3 May 2024 newsletter entitled “Path To UNGA 2024 As Of 3 May 24 / Events On 14-15 May (DC, NYC)” for details), ESCMID leadership announced that ESCMID had developed a petition to be sent by and from the

Scroll to Top