European Parliament Resolution on Access to (and value of) Medicines

Dear All:

The attached EU Parliament resolution on Access to Medicines was released today. Broadly, it calls for greater transparency in price setting for medicines and for harmonization of HTA processes. Along the way, AMR gets a couple of specific mentions as does the Adaptive Pathway concept that provides some of the logic behind registering antibiotics with relatively smaller programs.

I encourage everyone to take a few minutes to carefully page through it as reading the text directly gives you an excellent sense of the ebb & flow of the debate. You can really feel the philosophical tension between “We want to support industry as innovative pharmaceuticals have value” and “There’s only so much we can afford and these medicines really save lives.”

Note in particular the language calling for compulsory relative effectiveness (RE) estimates. This is a highly problematic concept for many reasons. Although we can (and should) routinely show comparable activity via non-inferiority studies, RE entails to my ear the implicit goal of clinical superiority. This is very challenging (and arguably not desirable) for new anti-infectives as discussed in slides 7-10 of the deck I used at last week’s FDA meeting on animal models in support of narrow-spectrum agents.

An extended written discussion of the tension between superiority and non-inferiority for anti-infectives will come in a paper that we now have in press at Clinical Infectious Diseases. I’m expecting this paper to become an online preprint very soon and will forward that link when it is released.

That said, it will still be necessary for new antibiotics to show their value. The most obvious way is through true novelty. Inventing a new class of fire extinguisher (metaphorically) is the most obvious such path. But, truly novel mechanisms/classes have always been rare birds and we must also find ways to show the value of products that are more incremental in terms of their advance. There’s lots of debate about this at present and I remain hopeful that we’ll find a path.

Best wishes, –jr

 John H. Rex, MD | Chief Medical Officer, F2G Ltd. | Chief Strategy Officer, CARB-X | Expert-in-Residence, Wellcome Trust. Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx

Share

Conflict-Borne XDR Superbugs: It’s Time for the PASTEUR Act!

Dear All: The recent publication of an exceptionally good plain-language summary of the AMR problem in Rolling Stone (yes, you read that correctly!) prompts today’s 3-part journey into the way(s) that war contributes to the threat of resistant superbugs. We’ve summarized the story in outline form — please explore the references for further details. And

ENABLE-2 funding now includes Hit Identification & Validation

23 July 2024 addenda x 2:  Mark Blaskovich let me know that the CO-ADD project is still offering a free in vitro screening service. See https://www.co-add.org/ to submit compounds for free testing vs 5 bacteria and 2 fungi; see https://db.co-add.org/ for structures and screening data on >100K compounds. The GHIT Fund has announced its 21st Request for Proposals for its Hit-to-Lead Platform to

NIAID/DMID thinking for FY2026: Antibacterials, Phage, and Antifungals

Dear All, NIAID’s DMID (Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases) recently held a council meeting during which they proposed program concepts that encompassed both antibacterial therapies (including phage) as well as antifungal therapies for funding in FY 2026 (the year that would run from 1 Oct 2025 to 30 Sep 2026). There is no guarantee that

WHO Antibacterial Pipeline Review: Update thru 31 Dec 2023

Dear All, WHO have released an update through 31 Dec 2023 of their ongoing series of antibacterial pipeline reviews! Here are the links you need: The report: 2023 Antibacterial agents in clinical and preclinical development: an overview and analysis and a press release about the report. Infographics: Key facts and recommendations from the 2023 antibacterial agents in clinical

Scroll to Top