Incentives for antibiotics: Recent papers, with an emphasis on Pull

Dear All: 

For your weekend reading list, I have some papers on the topic of (mostly pull) incentives for antibiotics.

First, I previously wrote about the survey from TATFAR (Transatlantic Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance) of 6 possible pull models (higher reimbursement, diagnostic confirmation, market entry rewards both fully and partially delinked, tradable exclusivity vouchers, and an options market). The final paper is now out (Ardal et al., Clin Infect Dis, 15 Oct 2017) and is definitely worth reading. You’ll also want to (re)review their prior paper (Sciaretta et al., Clin Infect Dis, 2016) on push and pull incentives.

The short summary of these papers would be that (a) we need both Push and Pull incentives and (b) there is no perfect Pull incentive but the one that seems to provide the best balance of useful effects with minimal disruption is the idea of a market entry reward that uses relatively smaller rewards to top up market-based revenues. This is also sometimes called a partially delinked market entry reward model.

Consistent with this,a new paper from Towse et al. has recently appeared in Health Policy (disclaimer — I am a co-author on this paper). Entitled “Time for a change in how new antibiotics are reimbursed: Development of an insurance framework for funding new antibiotics based on a policy of risk mitigation”, this paper compares a higher (premium) price Pull model with a partially delinked model. It concludes that:

  • A premium price model has uncertain impact and risks putting commercial return and appropriate stewardship in opposition.
  • An insurance model can achieve investment, reduce uncertainty for health systems, and achieve stewardship.

Third, don’t forget that DRIVE-AB is continuing to generate materials. Their July 2017 commentary to the G20 is consistent with all of the above and their final reports should start to appear soon.

Finally, IDSA’s Stakeholder Forum on Antimicrobial Resistance (http://s-far.org/; link no longer working as of March 2022) is a partnership of  more than 100 health organizations seeking to ensure that any U.S. government strategy to address antimicrobial resistance involves sustained and meaningful engagement with non-government experts and stakeholders throughout the policy development and implementation process. Their website provides links to a variety of key documents on AMR.

All best wishes, –jr

John H. Rex, MD | Chief Medical Officer, F2G Ltd. | Expert-in-Residence, Wellcome Trust. Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx. See past newsletters and subscribe for the future: http://amr.solutions/blog/

Upcoming meetings of interest to the AMR community:

Share

A Nature Article, a PASTEUR Act Op-Ed, and a VERY Important Phone Number

Dear All, First, Nature published an excellent article entitled “The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology” by Gow et al. The first sentence of the introduction really packs a punch — “The age of antibiotics, spanning only 80 years, is now entering a period of progressive and widespread emergence of drug-resistant organisms that threaten to bring

Raising awareness of AMR: WHO report on best approaches

Dear All, In addition to forming the inaugural WHO Task Force of AMR Survivors, the WHO has also recently released a report entitled “Awareness-raising on Antimicrobial Resistance: Report of global consultation meetings.”  The report is based on discussions at two meetings held by WHO with stakeholders from across the world. Even before opening the report,

Support the FORWARD and PASTEUR Acts by signing a letter!

Dear All, I’ve written before about the FORWARD Act, a bill introduced last year into Congress with the goal of supporting research in to treatment of endemic fungal diseases with a particular focus on coccidioidomycosis (*). It’s easy to see how this bill and the PASTEUR Act are mutually supportive … both seek to build

Scroll to Top