7 Nov 2017 FDA VRBPAC: Clinical development plan for a S. aureus vaccine

Addendum: This is the first in a 3-newsletters series on this topic. Go here and here for the next two newsletters.

Dear All: 

I just learned that FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Committee (VRBPAC) will meet at White Oak in an open session on 7 Nov 2017 to discuss and make recommendations on the clinical development plan for Pfizer’s investigational Staphylococcus aureus vaccine intended for pre-surgical prophylaxis in elective orthopedic surgical populations. The only materials available are the announcement at this link — more materials are promised no less than 2 business days in advance.

This is really interesting to see. We’ve had prior debates on this topic that have revolved around these questions:

  1. Can you use eradication of carriage as a measure of the value of prophylactic agent?
  2. How big does the study have to be if you must show reduction in a serious (non-trivial) clinical infection?
  3. In what population can you do this?


In general the answers to date have been NO, VERY LARGE, and NOT SURE. The answer of NO for Q1 is well stated in the 23 Oct 2013 EMA Addendum (Section 3.5.3): Indications that relate to the reduction or eradication of a pathogen from a specified body site are not acceptable unless the microbiological effect of active treatment has been shown to result in a measurable clinical benefit. In the absence of adequate data to support such a link, the clinical benefit associated with the effect of treatment on carriage should be demonstrated in a placebo-controlled study with a primary clinical endpoint.

The final NOT SURE answer follows in part because the moment you identify a group at real risk, there is an ethical requirement to do everything you can to reduce the rate of infection (e.g., use really good peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis). And the VERY LARGE follows from the need to then limit studies to a setting where the risk of infection is low!

Although it is important that we have tools of this type, the difficulties implied by these answers have stymied work to date. I am delighted to see this VRBPAC announcement and look forward to hearing the discussion!

All best wishes, –jr

John H. Rex, MD | Chief Medical Officer, F2G Ltd. | Expert-in-Residence, Wellcome Trust. Follow me on Twitter: @JohnRex_NewAbx. See past newsletters and subscribe for the future: http://amr.solutions/blog/

Upcoming meetings of interest to the AMR community:

Share

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on whatsapp
Share on reddit

AMR Action Fund ($1b for P2-3): Video chat with new CEO! New committed funds!

Dear All, I’ve written before about the AMR Action Fund (9 Jul 2020 newsletter): In brief, it is ~$1b pledged by over 20 leading pharmaceutical companies to support the Phase 2-3 studies needed to bring 2-4 new antibiotics to approval by 2030 Stated differently, the AMR Action Fund provides Push incentives for Phase 2-3 to complement the Push Incentives

UK Antibiotic Subscription Pilot: Updates from a webinar

Dear All (and with thanks to Kevin Outterson for co-authoring), We’ve written and talked before from various perspectives about the groundbreaking UK NHS England-, NHS Improvement-, and NICE-sponsored antibiotic subscription pilot project: 10 Feb 2021: Fabulous 5-minute video explainer on the economics of antibiotics by Andrew Jack of Financial Times Superb discussions of Push/Pull, the role

Brilliant 5-minute video explainer of the AMR problem!

 Dear All, Andrew Jack of the Financial Times (FT) has produced a superb 5-minute video explainer of the AMR challenge! Featuring cameos from Kevin Outterson (CARB-X), Christine Ardal (Norwegian Institute of Public Health), and Manica Balasegaram (GARDP), the video deftly illustrates the economic challenge, the way that delinked Netflix-like models provide a solution, and the

Job with global impact: Director, CIDRAP Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

Dear All, Launched in 2016, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) of the University of Minnesota works to provide support globally to the the infectious disease community via such diverse activities as ASP-oriented podcasts, webinars, journal clubs, and other resources. CIDRAP itself is directed by the

Scroll to Top